Published
What is reasoning provenance?
An introduction to the concept of making the chain from regulation to judgement explicit and inspectable — and why it matters for regulated institutions.
Insights/Explainers
Explainers
Plain-language explanations of regulatory concepts, assurance methods and the ideas behind Qlogue's research. Written for practitioners who want to understand the reasoning, not just the conclusion.
Read →
Published
Assurance can fail at the joins
Individual components can each appear correct while the overall conclusion is wrong. This explainer examines how assurance failures often occur between components rather than within them.
Research programme
What is continuous judgement?
Reasoning provenance makes judgement traceable. Continuous judgement keeps that reasoning connected to changing evidence, assumptions and conditions over time.
Research programme
Provenance is not proof
A visible reasoning chain can expose poor reasoning. It cannot guarantee good reasoning. This explainer examines what provenance does and does not establish.
Research question
Component testing versus trace-based assurance
Traditional assurance often tests components individually. Qlogue is investigating whether failures can persist in the joins between those components — particularly where evidence becomes interpretation, interpretation becomes a field, and a field becomes a decision.